<  HOME  >       10-21-2019 
        Susan (A retired Technical Writer & High-level language Computer Programmer  researches the F-35 Havoc )    ABOUT Susan   

   "Havoc" definition :   confusion and lack of order that result in damage or trouble  ::  (Definition of havoc from the Cambridge Academic Content Dictionary © Cambridge  

 hhhh 

  -- See NOTES - accumulating below - related to each of these F-35 Program "OBJECTS"   ::  WERE they abstracted,  encapsulated,  polymorph-ized and/or  inherited ?  

hhhhh -- The transformation of something inherently complex into a representation comprehensible by simple, ignorant minds causes the loss of information ... "data loss"  

 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_science ::  https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/us/chomsky.htm  

NOTES:  - from Astronauts to Ziggurats  ::    hhhhh 

h

h

h

h

h

10-13-2019

 "Structured Programming" "Waterfall"  "OOP" Object :   https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Introduction_to_Software_Engineering/Process/Methodology   

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Use_case 

https://searchapparchitecture.techtarget.com/definition/object-oriented-programming-OOP < Description of OOP 

Data modeling is the process of documenting a complex software system design as an easily understood diagram, using text and symbols to represent the way data needs to flow. The diagram can be used to ensure efficient use of data, as a blueprint for the construction of new software or for re-engineering a legacy application.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Object-oriented_modeling   
 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agile_software_development
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agile_software_development#The_Manifesto_for_Agile_Software_Development 
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agile_software_development#The_Manifesto_for_Agile_Software_Development 
  

OOP modeling tools "... Four major principles underlie OO modeling. These are: 
abstraction, 
encapsulation, 
polymorphism, 
and inheritance. 
Although not specific to OO modeling, abstraction is a key principle.Jan 3, 2013 ..."

 modeling tools such as Cameo and Rhapsody  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_Magic 
- Cameo ::  https://www.nomagic.com/mbse/overview/technical-overview.html  
- Rhapsody ::  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rational_Rhapsody#targetText=Rational%20Rhapsody%2C%20a%20modeling%20environment,or%20embedded%20systems%20and%20software.&targetText=The%20product%20contains%20a%20server,been%20developed%20in%20Rational%20Rhapsody. 
"... Rational Rhapsody, a modeling environment based on UML, is a visual development environment for systems engineers and software developers creating real-time or embedded systems and software. Rational Rhapsody uses graphical models to generate software applications in various languages including C, C++, Ada, Java and C#. Developers use Rational Rhapsody to understand and elaborate requirements, create model designs using industry standard languages (UML, SysML, AUTOSAR, DoDAF, MODAF, UPDM), validate functionality early in development, and automate delivery of high structured products.[1] ..."

  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unified_Modeling_Language

 Prognostics and Health Management (PLTM) system   
  SOURCE: https://www.ziprecruiter.com/c/Lockheed-Martin/Job/Data-Architect/-in-Orlando,FL?jid=DO249099cd7c3d4d4d0fdbfcbbb577edf7
"...   Data Architect Lockheed Martin Orlando, FL :: Posted: September 09, 2019
Full-Time
**Description:** This position is for a senior level Data Architect within the Lockheed Martin Chief Data and Analytics Office \(CDAO\), reporting to the Data Strategy Senior Manager\. The successful candidate will operate at the intersection of systems architecture, business process architecture, and information architecture to ensure the implementation of LM data strategy aligns to and enables the LM business strategy\. Responsibilities include:
\- Data architecture for the Digital Transformation Program \(DTP\) Data Strategy Value Stream, working in concert with the DTP Systems Engineering, Integration & Test \(SEIT\) organization and the business area CDAO teams\.
\- Drive enterprise\-level data architecture standards, including partnership with the Big 4 program, to support business process transformations in areas such as Enterprise Resource Planning \(ERP\), Product Lifecycle Management \(PLM\), Manufacturing Execution Systems \(MES\), and Human Resources Management Systems \(HRMS\)\.
\- Define and develop enterprise\-wide data domains, enable data domain stewards, and consult across the enterprise on federated data architecture solutions\.
\- Apply systems engineering and systems architecture disciplines to data strategy implementation and operations
\- Support data strategy activities such as data governance, data sharing/rights, data quality, data exchange, etc\.
POSITION CAN BE WORKED FROM ANY MAJOR LM LOCATION\.
**Basic Qualifications:**
\- Proven experience with data and information architecture
\- Proven experience with systems engineering and systems architecture
\- Proven experience with business process architecture and process transformation
\- Proven experience leading a distributed technical team to implement and operationalize a strategic goal
\- Proven experience harmonizing systems, processes, and/or data across business areas and functions
\- Proven experience building and communicating technical and functional roadmaps
**Desired Skills:**
\- Experience with model\-based systems engineering \(MBSE\) methodology
\- Experience with System of Systems \(SoS\) architecture
\- Experience with Systems Modeling Language \(SysML\) and/or Unified Modeling Language \(UML\)
\- Experience with frameworks and standards such as Department of Defense Architecture Framework \(DoDAF\), Open Applications Group Integration Specification \(OAGIS\), and APQC process classification frameworks \(PCF\)
\- Experience with modeling tools such as Cameo and Rhapsody
\- Working knowledge of the LM Digital Transformation Program
**BASIC QUALIFICATIONS:**
job\.Qualifications
**Lockheed Martin is an Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer\. All qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, pregnancy, sexual orientation, gender identity, national origin, age, protected veteran status, or disability status\.**
Join us at Lockheed Martin, where your mission is ours\. Our customers tackle the hardest missions\. Those that demand extraordinary amounts of courage, resilience and precision\. They're dangerous\. Critical\. Sometimes they even provide an opportunity to change the world and save lives\. Those are the missions we care about\.
As a leading technology innovation company, Lockheed Martin's vast team works with partners around the world to bring proven performance to our customers' toughest challenges\. Lockheed Martin has employees based in many states throughout the U\.S\., and Internationally, with business locations in many nations and territories\.
**EXPERIENCE LEVEL:**
Experienced Professional

Lockheed Martin
Address
Orlando, FL
32806 USA  ..."

 https://www.phmsociety.org/sites/phmsociety.org/files/PHMvision.pdf  

 https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/6024363/citations#citations 

 https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/6024363?section=abstract
 https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/6024363?section=abstract

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0888327016304149 

 https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6231471

"... Abstract:
Prognostic health management (PHM) is a method for assuring the reliability of a system by monitoring the system in real time as it is used in the field. As the system wears out, but before failure, information that facilitates decision making about the future use of the system is delivered to the user. In this paper, a cost justification has been developed for incorporating the additional circuitry needed to enable prognostics for electrical components directly onto a functional circuit board. Implementing PHM capability for circuit boards will add additional cost to a system, so high reliability systems where the cost of failure is high are easiest to cost justify for prognostics. Aerospace, defense and automotive, applications qualify as high reliability systems. Application domains that require high uptime, minimal amounts of unplanned maintenance, and controllable operating costs can also be cost justified for prognostics since they can benefit from the pro-active management of failures facilitated by PHM. Intangible criteria such as safety or the cost of human life also motivated the need for PHM, so often times projects are labeled strategic, and not subjected to the discipline of a financial analysis. This paper will show rigorous methods for assessing the decision to invest in PHM for electronics. The uncertain nature of research and development (R&D) and difficult to predict future economic conditions is not well captured by traditional discounted cash flow (DCF) methods. An approach known as the Datar-Mathews (DM) method will extend the DCF methods to be equivalent to a real options analysis and the Black-Scholes formula. The DM method is intuitive and uses concepts familiar to most engineers and technical managers.
Published in: 13th InterSociety Conference on Thermal and Thermomechanical Phenomena in Electronic Systems
Date of Conference: 30 May-1 June 2012
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 05 July 2012
 ISBN Information:
 ISSN Information:
INSPEC Accession Number: 12849576
DOI: 10.1109/ITHERM.2012.6231471
Publisher: IEEE
Conference Location: San Diego, CA, USA ..." 
 
Document Sections
1.
Introduction
2.
F-35 PHM System Development
3.
F-35 PHM System Operation
4.

Abstract:
F-35 "Lightning II" Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) Program is developing a comprehensive and industry-leading Prognostics and Health Management (PLTM) system.
This system, which is central to the program's Performance Based Logistics (PBL) approach, is built on incremental capability deployment and a careful balance of on-aircraft and off-board software, systems, and processes. The breadth of capability development and timing of deployment is unprecedented for a combat aviation system.
The initial set of F-35 PHM capabilities is currently deployed and actively supporting the flight test program. This paper will provide a top level overview of the F-35 PHM concept and architecture, the incremental design approach, and discuss overall program status. Some specific examples of long-term system benefits, in relation to sustainment and PBL business decisions, will be discussed.  Published in: 2011 IEEE Conference on Prognostics and Health Management

 "data modeling" "F-35" "objects"

 Experience in maintaining, troubleshooting, or Prognostics & Health Management (PHM) capability development for the F-35 aircraft

 https://searchapparchitecture.techtarget.com/definition/object-oriented-programming-OOP  
 "... The first step in OOP is to identify all of the objects a programmer wants to manipulate and how they relate to each other, an exercise often known as data modeling. ..."

 https://searchdatamanagement.techtarget.com/definition/data-modeling 

 https://pl.cs.jhu.edu/oose/projects/index.shtml

 https://pl.cs.jhu.edu/
The Programming Languages Laboratory at The Johns Hopkins University

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Object-oriented_programming   < History 
 A Programming  methodology which enables a "system" to be modeled as a set of objects which can be controlled and manipulated in a modular manner.

"object-oriented" projects
"... An OO project is a sequence of unique, complex and connected activities having one goal or purpose that must be completed by a specific time, within budget and according to specification, that uses Object Technology to help reach its goal. ..."

 Computer History ::  https://www.computerhistory.org/timeline/computers/ 

 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_quality_assurance

 https://www.product-lifecycle-management.com/download/DOD-STD-2167A.pdf 

 DoDSTD-2167 4 JUNE 1985
SUPERSEDING DOD-STD-1679A (NAVY) 22 OCTOBER 1983
MILSTD-1644B (TDl) 2 MARCH 1984

  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waterfall_model  :::  https://www.tutorialspoint.com/sdlc/sdlc_waterfall_model.htm

https://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/binary/bin_1.html
https://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/binary/bin_2.html 

binary logic numbers  :: https://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/binary/bin_1.html 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memory_address

computer state logic ::  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-state_logic

Very often, when referring to the word size of a modern computer, one is also describing the size of address space on that computer

 It denotes the number of bits that a CPU can process at one time.  

 SOURCE: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIL-STD-498 :::: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIL-STD-498 

Addressable memory locations digital software

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Programming_language  

 SOURCE: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DOD-STD-2167A 
"... Criticism
One criticism of the standard was that it was biased toward the Waterfall Model. Although the document states "the contractor is responsible for selecting software development methods (for example, rapid prototyping)", it also required "formal reviews and audits" that seemed to lock the vendor into designing and documenting the system before any implementation began.[citation needed]

Another criticism was the focus on design documents, to the exclusion of Computer-Aided Software Engineering (CASE) tools being used in the industry. Vendors would often use the CASE tools to design the software, then write several standards-required documents to describe the CASE-formatted data. This created problems matching design documents to the actual product.[citation needed]

Successors
One result of these criticisms was to begin designing a successor standard, which became MIL-STD-498.[5] 

Another result was a preference for formal industry-designed standards (such as IEEE 12207) and informal "best practice" specifications, rather than trying to determine the best processes and making them formal specifications.

MIL-STD-2167A with MIL-STD-498 eventually became the basis for DO-178 in the early 1980s,[6] the latter followed by subsequent revisions. MIL-STD-2167 and MIL-STD-498 together define standard software development life cycle processes that are expected to be implemented and followed as well as defining standard document format and content. In contrast, DO-178B/C defines objectives that should be accomplished as acceptable means[7] of demonstrating airworthiness, permitting relative flexibility in the life cycles and processes employed to accomplish those objectives.[8] ..."

 DOD-STD-498

 DoDSTD-2167   DoDSTD-2167

https://dokumen.tips/documents/dod-std-2167.html  >> https://dokumen.tips/download/link/dod-std-2167

 https://dokumen.tips ::  https://dokumen.tips/download/link/dod-std-2167

BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

 https://calhoun.nps.edu/bitstream/handle/10945/8896/reengineeringofm00hirs.pdf?sequence=1 <189 pages 

 Re-engineering of a mission critical satellite  communications component TD-1271B/U photos
 http://www.navy-radio.com/ships/bb61-3.htm < Photos < USS Iowa BB-61 Radio Room Photos - August 2017 
 http://www.navy-radio.com/index.htm  
 http://www.navy-radio.com/manuals/NAVCOMM-history-2006.pdf   
 http://www.navy-radio.com/manuals/NAVCOMM-history-2006.pdf

 "pdf" DOD-STD-1679A "DOD-STD-1679" A  :: 

 SOURCE: https://media.defense.gov/1992/Mar/04/2001714626/-1/-1/1/92-056.pdf

 "... The program office did not insert DOD-STD 1679 or 1679A in lieu of DOD-STD 2167A.
The initial software development took place well before DOD-STD 2167 even existed. DOD-STD-2167 came into existence in 1985 and
was revised again in 1988 (DOD-STD 2167Al . It was determined that the expense associated with forcing the contractor to comply in full with the guidelines of 2167A was not worth the advantages. Instead, a phased-in approach was chosen which is more practical and cost effective. Currently, in Lots IV, V and beyond, the contractor is required to deliver all data items (software and documentation) per the guidelines of 2167A. ..."

 https://vdocuments.mx/amp/ieee-comput-soc-press-fourth-software-engineering-standards-application-58b8bc135fd29.html

 https://calhoun.nps.edu/bitstream/handle/10945/8896/reengineeringofm00hirs.pdf?sequence=1

 "Perry Memo" ::  William Perry :: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Perry 

 SOURCE: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Military_Standard 
"...  In the U.S. during the 1980s and early 1990s, it was argued that the large number of standards, nearly 30,000 by 1990, imposed unnecessary restrictions, increased cost to contractors (and hence the DOD, since the costs in the end pass along to the customer), and impeded the incorporation of the latest technology. 

 [ Responding to increasing criticism ... SUSAN SAYS ]

Responding to increasing criticism, Secretary of Defense William Perry issued a memorandum in 1994 that prohibited the use of most military specifications and standards without a waiver.[3] This has become known as the “Perry memo”. 

Many military specifications and standards were canceled. In their place, the DOD directed the use of performance specifications and non-government standards. 

“Performance specifications” describe the desired performance of the weapon, rather than describing how those goals would be reached (that is, directing which technology or which materials would be used). 

In 2005 the DOD issued a new memorandum[4] which eliminated the requirement to obtain a waiver in order to use military specifications or standards. 
The 2005 memo did not reinstate any canceled military specifications or standards. ..."

 AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA 

SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

10-12-2019

https://doi.org/10.2514/5.9781624105678.0681.0710

 https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/10.2514/5.9781624105678.0253.0286

 MIL-STD-1530 Aircraft Structural Integrity Program (ASIP)
  https://www.dau.edu/cop/log/DAU%20Sponsored%20Documents/MIL%20STD%201530C%201.pdf 

 https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/4.105678 

http://s3.amazonaws.com/fcmd/documents/documents/000/001/687/original/lockheed-martin-davis_complaint.pdf?1423020683

"... Defendant Lockheed Martin Corporation (“Lockheed” or “Defendant”) is a
Maryland corporation with its principal place of business at 
6801 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20817. software 

More relevant to the events herein, is the Lockheed Martin
Corporation offices located at

 1 Lockheed Street, Fort Worth, Texas 76108. software 
Through such offices, the relevant Joint Strike Force Program and other similar programs were managed in relevant part.

 The software development process, its quality control and its compliance
evaluations for the F-35 and other programs occurred under the auspices of these offices.

Lockheed’s agent for service of process is Frances J. Frizzell, 6801 Rockledge Drive,
Bethesda, MD 20817.  ..."
 https://employzone.com/job-view/us-texas-fort-worth/lockheed-martin-careers/lockheedmartin/1598753736

Design Integration Systems Engineering Test FORCE Cost Earned Value  Interoperability SAIT Business Fiance Air Worthiness  International

 https://timedotcom.files.wordpress.com/2016/04/attachment_10_sow_20160317.pdf
 https://timedotcom.files.wordpress.com/
https://timedotcom.

 Lincoln Law : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_Claims_Act :: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_Claims_Act

 https://www.iso.org/standard/63712.html 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_development_process  

 Military Software Development Specifications  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIL-STD-498
          It was meant as an interim standard, to be in effect for about two years until a commercial standard was developed.
 it was canceled on May 27, 1998 and replaced by the essentially identical demilitarized version EIA J-STD-016[1]

  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO/IEC_12207 

  ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288:2015 ::  

  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_development_process  

SYLVESTER DAVIS Lockheed "flight control software" Houston-based lawyer Samuel Boyd 

 https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/texas/txndce/4:2009cv00645/191283/107/   

 http://s3.amazonaws.com/fcmd/documents/documents/000/001/687/original/lockheed-martin-davis_complaint.pdf?1423020683 

 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joint_Strike_Fighter_program  <History - The Beginning ::  

Joint Advanced Strike Technology (JAST) Common Affordable Lightweight Fighter (CALF) project to make the Joint Strike Fighter program.

 JAST  ::  
Joint Advanced Strike Technology (JAST) project was merged with the  Common Affordable Lightweight Fighter (CALF) project to make the Joint Strike Fighter program.

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

JSF Program Executive Officer : Lt. Gen. Eric T. Fick was > Vice Adm. Mat Winter 

Deputy JSF Program Executive Officer : http://www.jsf.mil/leadership/lead_fick.htm : was Eric T. Fick

JSF Director of Engineering : 
https://www.af.mil/About-Us/Biographies/Display/Article/1135005/jay-w-fiebig/ : JAY W. FIEBIG 

JSF Air System Integration 
  https://www.lockheedmartin.com/content/dam/lockheed-martin/eo/documents/webt/F-35_Air_Vehicle_Technology_Overview.pdf 
 "... e the Subsystems Integration Technology (SUIT) studies
[1-7], Joint Advanced Strike Technology (JAST) program, Air Force Research Laboratory’s (AFRL’s) Advanced
Compact Inlet Systems (ACIS) program, Vehicle Integration Technology Planning Studies (VITPS) studies [8, 9],
More-Electric Aircraft (MEA) studies [10], and Joint Strike Fighter (JSF)/Integrated Subsystems Technology (J/IST)
demonstration program [11-20]. Additionally, numerous independent research and development (IRAD) and contract
research and development (CRAD) projects were completed that formed a part of the F-35 design basis [21-36]. 
Many of these technological enhancements were not incorporated into the X-35 demonstrator due to schedule constraints to
complete the flyable demonstrator aircraft. They were also postponed due to the results of a technical risk assessment
that made them undesirable candidates for the X-35. Instead, the full development and integration of these
technologies were deferred for incorporation during the Engineering and Manufacturing Development (EMD) phase
(later known as the System Development and Demonstration [SDD] program). 
This resulted in the final F-35 design configuration ..." ### Lockheed Martin worked closely with Parker Aerospace ###
   Parker Aerospace : https://www.parker.com/parkerimages/Parker.com/Countries-2011/United%20States/About%20Us/Parker%20Hannifin%20FY19%20Fact%20Sheet%20(September%2026,%202019).pdf
        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parker_Hannifin  ::  
  https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/engineers-discover-culprit-behind-f-35b-fueldraulic-line-failure-381574/

JSF CHIEF ENGINEER ::  https://www.af.mil/About-Us/Biographies/Display/Article/555412/tanya-m-skeen/ 

  https://www.af.mil/About-Us/Biographies/Display/Article/555412/tanya-m-skeen/ 
 "... 1. November 2014 – present, Deputy Director of Test and Evaluation, HQ U.S. Air Force, Wash., D.C. ..."

JSF AIR SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT ::  Matt Maxwell. Director. F-35 JSF Air System Development.
 http://www.asdnews.com/news-25232/uk_announces_approval_of_3rd_f-35b_jsf_purchase.htm

JSF BUSINESS  (INTEGRATION) ???? 
 http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http://www.jsf.mil/program/prog_org_bfm.htm&strip=1&vwsrc=0

JSF AIR SYSTEM (SUSTAINMENT) [TBD]
   - https://www.gao.gov/assets/700/698693.pdf
   - https://www.lexingtoninstitute.org/jsf-program-creates-unique-sustainment-model/
   - https://www.f35.com/about/life-cycle/sustainment 

JSF AIR SYSTEM PRODUCTION "... The Air System Production team is responsible for Production Statusing, Production Planning, and Production Operations. ..."
 http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http://www.jsf.mil/program/prog_org_asproduction.htm
 http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http://www.jsf.mil/program/prog_org_asproduction.htm&strip=1&vwsrc=0

"JSF" FUNCTIONAL TEAMS:
 F-35 Design Integration
Systems Engineering
 Integ. Test FORCE
Cost Earned Value
 Interoperability
  SAIT
Requirements
Business Fiance
Air Worthiness 
 International

PRODUCT TEAMS:
 Air Vehicle
Mission
Vehicle Systems
Weapons Integration
Air Frame
AV SEIT
AutoLog
Global Sustainment
Training Systems
SEIT
Support Systems / SE
ALIS : https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/products/autonomic-logistics-information-system-alis.html
 PBA Planner
Propulsion
F-135
F-136
SEIT

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

https://www.jec.senate.gov/reports/99th%20Congress/Navy%20Shipbuilding%20Problems%20at%20General%20Dynamics%20Part%203%20(1423).pdf
https://archive.org/stream/DTIC_ADA335583/DTIC_ADA335583_djvu.txt <  The Mission of AGARD [1997]
"...  Executive Summary :: For many years, advances in defence technology focused primarily on improving performance. 
Improvements in military systems were made in order to maintain superiority over potential adversaries 
and to counter potential threats, with little regard to cost. However, in recent years, increasing 
technological sophistication has caused the unit cost of military systems to increase dramatically. 
Initially, increasing unit cost could be accommodated because adequate military capability could be 
maintained with smaller numbers of more advanced systems. However, if allowed to continue, this 
trend must lead to the situation in which there are too few units to ensure they are available when and 
where they are needed. 

The Joint SMP/FVP Conference on Affordable Combat Aircraft considered the approaches necessary 
to ensure that future manned combat aircraft continue to be affordable. Sessions on affordability of 
procurement, combat effectiveness, affordability of ownership, and the human element, contained 
papers which illustrated some of the very wide range of topics which need to be addressed. The 
presentations and discussion led to the conclusion that life-cycle cost must be considered as a primary 
design parameter and that, to control cost, performance goals must he defined in terms of the function 
of the system rather than at the detailed technical level. Concurrent engineering and virtual 
manufacturing will have an increasingly significant impact in this area. New technologies should be 
introduced into systems only when they can be shown to buy their way in. Modular systems which 
allow cost effective maintenance, repair and updating, and the exploitation of commonalties with 
civilian equipment should also be encouraged. The investment necessary to support an on-board pilot 
must be maximised. In summary, cost considerations have already resulted in major changes to our 
approach to the development of manned combat aircraft. Future technological developments are 
expected to permit further radical changes over the next 25 years.   ..."

https://www.scribd.com/document/158255670/Memorandum-of-Understanding 

CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
Mr. Steven Bizier currently serves as the Director of Contracts at the F-35 Joint Program Office in Arlington, Virginia

Below is a brief timeline of the JAST/JSF/F-35 program's previous leaders all of whom have helped to shape the program in their own unique way.

VADM Mathias Winter, USN
May 2017 - July 2019

Lt Gen Christopher C. Bogdan, USAF
December 2012 - May 2017

VADM David J. Venlet, USN
May 2010 - December 2012

MajGen David R. Heinz, USMC
April 2009 - February 2010

Maj Gen Charles R. Davis, USAF
July 2006 - April 2009

RADM Steven L. Enewold, USN
June 2004 - July 2006

Maj Gen John L. Hudson, USAF
October 2001 - June 2004

MajGen Michael A. Hough, USMC
May 1999 - October 2001

Maj Gen Leslie F. Kenne, USAF
August 1997 - May 1999

RADM Craig E. Steidle, USN
August 1995 - August 1997

Maj Gen George K. Muellner, USAF
November 1993 - August 1995

CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC

 SOURCE: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http://www.jsf.mil/program/prog_org_asintegration.htm&strip=1&vwsrc=0 
 [text ONLY]
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:
   http://www.jsf.mil/program/prog_org_asintegration.htm   

"... It is the mission of the Air System Integration team to: Establish and execute the framework and forums to accomplish program-wide integration, consistent with the program vision statement. In working towards that goal, the Air System Integration team is responsible for ensuring all products and activities of the JPO are integrated/coordinated to achieve an optimum air system solution. The team is responsible for things such as:
Technical/performance/functional threads
Variant, Block, Basing, Interoperability
Block Plan management
Maintain Joint Common Specification
JRAG leadership
Acquisition Management
Defense Acquisition Board Milestone Planning and Documentation
Production Contract Planning and Development
Contractor Assessment
Earned Value, Cost Estimates
Information response to the Office of the Secretary of Defense, Services, Congressional, International Partner and other outside agency queries
Manages program level reviews, boards and working groups

Home | Program | Leadership | F-35 | News | Gallery : History | Downloads | Acronyms | Careers | Site Map | Contact  ..."

BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

 SOURCE: http://www.jsf.mil/downloads/documents/JSF_PSFD_MOU_-_Update_4_2010.PDF : "JSF"  Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) page 93 

 4.1.3 

CPP assignments to U.S. DoD field activities outside the JSF Program Office, including but not limited to CPP assignments in ALGS operations facilities in the United States, may be authorized based on the recommendation of the JSF PEO and approval of a change to this Annex by the JESB, which  reflects the addition of those assignments.  

In general, the number of CPP for a non-U.S. DoD Participant in U.S. DoD field activities outside the JSF Program Office will be commensurate to that Participant’s share of Financial Costs calculated in accordance with the Composite Share Ratio. 

"DoD field activities" : 
  https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/iss_process/DoD_OSD_Component_Heads.pdf?ver=2018-07-24-120314-287 [see page 4]

CPP [eight] Cooperative Program Partners 
DoD Department of Defense
JSF Joint Strike Fighter
ALGS  Autonomic Logistics Global Sustainment
PEO  Program Executive Officer
JESB  [Joint Strike Fighter] JSF Executive Steering Board 

 
4.1.4 The Participants recognize that 

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

http://www.stroustrup.com/JSF-AV-rules.pdf

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

 usaJobsJSF##

F-35 Program Executive Officer Contact

 hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

Joint Advanced Strike Technology (JAST) Program 

JOBS  >> https://www.usajobs.gov/Search/?l=45405 

 https://www.usajobs.gov/GetJob/ViewDetails/548544800 < page 24 Research Program Specialist

 https://www.usajobs.gov/GetJob/ViewDetails/548499900 <  INTELLIGENCE SPECIALIST

 https://www.usajobs.gov/GetJob/ViewDetails/548293600 < page 23 INTELLIGENCE SPECIALIST

 https://www.usajobs.gov/GetJob/ViewDetails/548191600 <  Acquisition Program Manager
 
 https://www.usajobs.gov/GetJob/ViewDetails/547858500 <  AEROSPACE ENGINEER

 Added disability Filter 

 https://www.usajobs.gov/GetJob/ViewDetails/548587600 < EXECUTIVE SUPPORT SPECIALIST

 https://www.usajobs.gov/GetJob/ViewDetails/548096600 < page 22 COMMUNITY PLANNER

 https://www.usajobs.gov/GetJob/ViewDetails/547995200  < QUALITY ASSURANCE SPECIALIST

 https://www.usajobs.gov/GetJob/ViewDetails/547160400  <  Mathematical Statistics Series

 https://www.usajobs.gov/GetJob/ViewDetails/547348600 <  Computer Scientist

 https://www.usajobs.gov/GetJob/ViewDetails/547744400 <  IT Project Manager (PLCYPLN) 

 https://www.usajobs.gov/GetJob/ViewDetails/546865000 < page 21 Technical Advisor of System Engineering

 https://www.usajobs.gov/GetJob/ViewDetails/543011800 <  ANALYST  (Project Manager)

 https://www.usajobs.gov/GetJob/ViewDetails/541323900# <  Information Technology Management

 https://www.usajobs.gov/GetJob/ViewDetails/534909500 <  PROFESSOR OF SYSTEMS ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT

https://www.usajobs.gov/GetJob/ViewDetails/533608000 < PROFESSOR OF CONTRACT MANAGEMENT

 DAU <  Defense Acquisition University ??????

https://www.usajobs.gov/GetJob/ViewDetails/529585000  < Public Notice for (STEM) Positions

 https://www.usajobs.gov/GetJob/ViewDetails/525309000  <  Environmental Engineer

 https://www.usajobs.gov/GetJob/ViewDetails/525313000  <  Electrical Engineer

 https://www.usajobs.gov/GetJob/ViewDetails/522846600  <  Biological Scientist  

 https://www.usajobs.gov/GetJob/ViewDetails/520457700  <  Investigations and Inquiries Specialist

 https://www.usajobs.gov/GetJob/ViewDetails/520423400  <  Management and Program Analysis 

 https://www.usajobs.gov/GetJob/ViewDetails/519082100  <  General Engineer - Direct Hire Authority

    DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE - Air Force Materiel Command  ?????  

 https://www.usajobs.gov/GetJob/ViewDetails/518276200 <  Physical Scientist 

 https://www.usajobs.gov/GetJob/ViewDetails/516888800  <  Engineering Technical - Direct Hire Authority

 https://www.usajobs.gov/GetJob/ViewDetails/516895500  <  Information Technology Management - Direct Hire Authority

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

JSF Program Executive Officer : Lt. Gen. Eric T. Fick was > Vice Adm. Mat Winter 

Deputy JSF Program Executive Officer : http://www.jsf.mil/leadership/lead_fick.htm : was Eric T. Fick

JSF Director of Engineering : 
https://www.af.mil/About-Us/Biographies/Display/Article/1135005/jay-w-fiebig/ : JAY W. FIEBIG 

JSF Air System Integration 
  https://www.lockheedmartin.com/content/dam/lockheed-martin/eo/documents/webt/F-35_Air_Vehicle_Technology_Overview.pdf 
 "... e the Subsystems Integration Technology (SUIT) studies
[1-7], Joint Advanced Strike Technology (JAST) program, Air Force Research Laboratory’s (AFRL’s) Advanced
Compact Inlet Systems (ACIS) program, Vehicle Integration Technology Planning Studies (VITPS) studies [8, 9],
More-Electric Aircraft (MEA) studies [10], and Joint Strike Fighter (JSF)/Integrated Subsystems Technology (J/IST)
demonstration program [11-20]. Additionally, numerous independent research and development (IRAD) and contract
research and development (CRAD) projects were completed that formed a part of the F-35 design basis [21-36]. 
Many of these technological enhancements were not incorporated into the X-35 demonstrator due to schedule constraints to
complete the flyable demonstrator aircraft. They were also postponed due to the results of a technical risk assessment
that made them undesirable candidates for the X-35. Instead, the full development and integration of these
technologies were deferred for incorporation during the Engineering and Manufacturing Development (EMD) phase
(later known as the System Development and Demonstration [SDD] program). 
This resulted in the final F-35 design configuration ..." ### Lockheed Martin worked closely with Parker Aerospace ###
   Parker Aerospace : https://www.parker.com/parkerimages/Parker.com/Countries-2011/United%20States/About%20Us/Parker%20Hannifin%20FY19%20Fact%20Sheet%20(September%2026,%202019).pdf
        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parker_Hannifin  ::  
  https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/engineers-discover-culprit-behind-f-35b-fueldraulic-line-failure-381574/

JSF CHIEF ENGINEER ::  https://www.af.mil/About-Us/Biographies/Display/Article/555412/tanya-m-skeen/
 "... 1. November 2014 – present, Deputy Director of Test and Evaluation, HQ U.S. Air Force, Wash., D.C. ..."

JSF AIR SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT ::  Matt Maxwell. Director. F-35 JSF Air System Development.
 http://www.asdnews.com/news-25232/uk_announces_approval_of_3rd_f-35b_jsf_purchase.htm

JSF BUSINESS  (INTEGRATION) ???? 
 http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http://www.jsf.mil/program/prog_org_bfm.htm&strip=1&vwsrc=0

JSF AIR SYSTEM (SUSTAINMENT) [TBD]
   - https://www.gao.gov/assets/700/698693.pdf
   - https://www.lexingtoninstitute.org/jsf-program-creates-unique-sustainment-model/
   - https://www.f35.com/about/life-cycle/sustainment 

JSF AIR SYSTEM PRODUCTION "... The Air System Production team is responsible for Production Statusing, Production Planning, and Production Operations. ..."
 http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http://www.jsf.mil/program/prog_org_asproduction.htm
 http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http://www.jsf.mil/program/prog_org_asproduction.htm&strip=1&vwsrc=0

"JSF" FUNCTIONAL TEAMS:
 F-35 Design Integration
Systems Engineering
 Integ. Test FORCE
Cost Earned Value
 Interoperability
  SAIT
Requirements
Business Fiance
Air Worthiness 
 International

"JSF" PRODUCT TEAMS:
  F-35 Air Vehicle  ::  https://www.f35.com/in-depth/detail/up-in-the-air-understanding-the-f-35-air-vehicle
F-35 Mission ::  "mult0Mission" :  https://www.f35.com/about/capabilities 
F-35 Vehicle Systems ::  https://www.f35.com/in-depth/detail/up-in-the-air-understanding-the-f-35-air-vehicle
F-35 Weapons Integration ::  https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/5.9781624105678.0183.0212 ::
  https://www.dote.osd.mil/pub/reports/FY2017/pdf/dod/2017f35jsf.pdf < Mission Data Load Development and Testing
F-35 Air Frame ::  https://www.baesystems.com/en-us/product/f-35
F-35  AV SEIT ::  AV System Engineering Integration and Test ::  https://timedotcom.files.wordpress.com/2016/04/attachment_10_sow_20160317.pdf
F-35  AutoLog ::  https://www.sae.org/events/dod/presentations/2006nealmccollom.pdf
 http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http://www.jsf.mil/downloads/documents/F-35_2004_Year-In-Review.PDF
 ::  http://www.jsf.mil/downloads/documents/F-35_2004_Year-In-Review.PDF

Global Sustainment 
Training Systems
  SEIT ::  System Engineering Integration and Test
Support Systems / SE
ALIS : https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/products/autonomic-logistics-information-system-alis.html
      https://www.phmsociety.org/sites/phmsociety.org/files/PHMvision.pdf <GOT it 
 PBA Planner
Propulsion
F-135
F-136
SEIT

 [END]